Nike Dri Fit Jacket Mens Running
md224 275 days ago link
gorrillamcd 275 days ago link
peeters 275 days Nike Dri Fit Jacket Mens Running ago link
klodolph 275 days ago link
a single question, gets banned for 15 years. The question, while not the best question ever, is decent enough and gets interesting answers but somehow gets a 35 score (edit: now down to 41 in the 20 minutes since I posted this comment), making it one of the worst questions on the site. The comments speculate that it was due to the edit war.
of suspension should be related to the severity of the offenses (in this case, vandalism and abusive speech) and the likelihood to commit additional offenses (in this case, high because the user vandalized the question many times).
That doesn happen. Instead: The power user who really should know better gets into a petty rollback war with the asker, and the question gets reverted 15 times in 5 minutes before another power user steps in and reverts it. The roll back wars stop, but an hour later a diamond moderator steps in and locks the question anyway. (Correction: I originally said it was unlocked 45 minutes later, but child comments correctly point out it was unlocked automatically a week later). The asker, who by all appearances has asked Nike Running Jacket Women's Waterproof
It was an automatically created "session" user (http: an anonymous user given an ad hoc account which they can later convert into a normal account. I don know that issuing this ban in itself blocks that person from signing up for another account tomorrow. Places like Wikipedia get more sophisticated to prevent so called "sock puppetry", I not sure if SO does the same automatically when an account is banned.
set arbitrary dates for a "temporary suspension". A month would be reasonable for a first offense I would think.
15 years?! I didn know moderators could Nike Long Sleeve Shirt Girls
" ALLAH AKBAR " AND YOU WILL ALL LOOK LIKE JIHAD CLUB
Accounts are cheap. Free, in fact. Length Nike Jackets Leather
He then added IF YOU GUYS ROLL BACK AGAIN, I AM CHANGING MY NICK TO
A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator
MEMBERS OF OSAMA BIN LADEN. In fact, I willing to wager that the user flagged the question immediately but it took an hour for one of the moderators to get around to it. As a moderator yourself, you know that the appropriate action once a user rolls back a valid edit to the question is to flag the question for a moderator and move on, which obviously didn happen. This question did not deserve the treatment it got but this type of thing happens with too much frequency for whatever reason: jaded power users, too large of a review queue, whatever. My point here is that while this looks like "mission accomplished" for a Stack Exchange power user, from an outside perspective, this looks positively kafkaesque.
> ok i got my answers, we can delete this post now, i am not helping google usersThis is a really weird thing to say. There is no reason why:1. two high rep users should engaged in a rapid fire edit war with a new user2. It not necessary, but because of the way moderation is structured on Stack Exchange, it so damn easy to do.
Nike Dri Fit Jacket Mens Running
Nike Dri Fit Jacket Womens Full ZipHome
Nike Tracksuits Ladies
Nike Tracksuit Junior
Converse Womens Slip On Sneakers
Nike Long Sleeve Top White
Nike Windrunner Orange And Black
Nike Tech Fleece Windrunner Blue
Nike Pullover Hoodie Men
Converse Shoes Ladies Australia
Nike Jacket Black And Gray
Nike Dri Fit Jacket Black
Converse Colors Shoes
Nike Jacket Black Men
Pink Converse High Tops Size 3
/ Nike Dri Fit Jacket Mens Running